Jump to content
Shiloh Discussion Group

Recommended Posts

For those who have never read it (or have not read it in a while) here is the Shiloh Report submitted by General Prentiss.

Cheers

Ozzy

 

Prentiss’s Official Shiloh Report of November 1862

COLONEL: Upon my return from captivity in the hands of the public enemy I have the honor to submit my report of the part taken in the battle of the 6th of April last, near Pittsburg Landing, by the Sixth Division, Army of West Tennessee, the command of which had been assigned to me. I have the honor to transmit field return of the force which was subjected to my control, as it appeared upon the morning of the engagement, the same being marked A.# [Sixth Division field returns and casualty record – Ozzy.]

Saturday evening, pursuant to instructions received when I was assigned to duty with the Army of West Tennessee, the usual advance guard was posted, and in view of information received from the commandant thereof, I sent forward five companies of the Twenty-fifth Missouri and five companies of the Twenty-first Missouri Infantry,under command of Colonel David Moore, Twenty-first Missouri. I also,after consultation with Colonel David Stuart, commanding a brigade of General Sherman's division, sent to the left one company of the Eighteenth Wisconsin Infantry, under command of Captain Fisk.

At about 7 o'clock the same evening Colonel Moore returned, reporting some activity in the front-an evident reconnaissance by cavalry. This information received, I proceeded to strengthen the guard stationed on the Corinth road, extending the picket lines to the front a distance of a mile and a half, at the same time extending and doubling the lines of the grand guard.

At 3 o'clock on the morning of Sunday, April 6, Colonel David Moore, Twenty-first Missouri, with five companies of his infantry regiment, proceeded to the front, and at break of day the advance pickets were driven in, whereupon Colonel Moore pushed forward and engaged the enemy's advance, commanded by General Hardee. At this stage a messenger was sent to my headquarters, calling for the balance of the Twenty-first Missouri, which was promptly sent forward. This information received, I at once ordered the entire force into line,and the remaining regiments of the First Brigade, commanded by Colonel Everett Peabody, consisting of the Twenty-fifth Missouri, Sixteenth Wisconsin, and Twelfth Michigan Infantry were advanced well to the front. I forthwith at this juncture communicated the fact of the attack in force to Major-General Smith and Brigadier General S. A. Hurlbut.

Shortly before 6 o'clock, Colonel David Moore having been severely wounded, his regiment commenced falling back, reaching our front line at about 6 o'clock, the enemy being close upon his rear. Hereupon the entire force, excepting only the Sixteenth Iowa, which had been sent to the field the day previous without ammunition,and the cavalry, which was held in readiness to the rear, was advanced to the extreme front, and thrown out alternately to the right and left.

Shortly after 6 o'clock the entire line was under fire, receiving the assault made by the entire force of the enemy, advancing in three columns simultaneously upon our left, center, and right. This position was held until the enemy had passed our right flank, this movement being effected by reason of the falling back of some regiment to our right not belonging to the division.

Perceiving the enemy was flanking me, I ordered the division to retire in line of battle to the color line of our encampment,at the same time communicating to Generals Smith and Hurlbut the fact of the falling back, and asking for re-enforcements.

Being again assailed, in position described, by an overwhelming force, and not being able longer to hold the ground against the enemy, I ordered the divisions to fal back to the line occupied by General Hurlbut, and at 9.05. a.m. reformed to the right of General Hurlbut, and to the left of Brigadier General W. H. L. Wallace, who I found in command of the division assigned to Major-General Smith. At this point the Twenty-third Missouri Infantry, commanded by Colonel Tindall, which had just disembarked from a transport,and had been ordered to report to me as a part of the Sixth Division, joined. This regiment I immediately assigned to position on the left. My battery (Fifth Ohio) was posted to the right on the road.

At about 10 o'clock my line was again assailed, and finding my command greatly reduced by reason of casualties and because of the falling back of many of the men to the river, they being panic-stricken- a majority of them having now for the first time been exposed to fire-I communicated,with General W. H. L. Wallace, who sent to my assistance the Eighth Iowa Infantry, commanded by Colonel J. L. Geddes.

After having once driven the enemy back form this position Major General U. S. Grant appeared upon the field. I exhibited to him the disposition of my entire force, which disposition received his commendation, and I received my final orders, which were to maintain that position at all hazards. This position I did maintain until 4 o'clock p.m. when General Hurlbut, being overpowered,was forced to retire. I was then compelled to change front with the Twenty-third Missouri, Twenty-first Missouri Eighteenth Wisconsin, Eighteenth Missouri, and part of the Twelfth Michigan, occupying a portion of the ground vacated by General Hurlbut. I was in constant communication with Generals Hurlbut and Wallace during the day, and both of them were aware of the importance of holding our position until night. When the gallant Hurlbut was forced to retire General Wallace and myself consulted, and agreed to hold our positions at all hazards, believing that we could thus save the army from destruction; we having been now informed for the first time that all others had fallen back to the vicinity of the river. A few minutes after General W. H. L. Wallace received the wound of which he shortly afterwards died. Upon the fall of General Wallace, his division,excepting the Eighth Iowa, Colonel Geddes, acting with me, and the Fourteenth Iowa, Colonel Shaw; Twelfth Iowa, Colonel Woods, and Fifty-eighth Illinois, Colonel Lynch, retired from the field.

Perceiving that I was about to be surrounded, and having dispatched my aide, Lieutenant Edwin Moore, for re-enforcements, I determined to assail the enemy, which had passed between me and the river, charging upon him with my entire force. I found him advancing in mass, completely encircling my command, and nothing was left but to harass him and retard his progress so long as might be possible. This I did until 5.30 p.m., when finding that further resistance must result in the slaughter of every man in the command, I had to yield the fight. The enemy succeeded in capturing myself and 2,200 rank and file, many of them being wounded.

Colonel Madison Miller, Eighteenth Missouri Infantry, was during the day in command of a brigade, and was among those taken prisoner. He acted during the day with distinguished courage, coolness, and ability. Upon Colonel J. L. Geddes, Eighth Iowa, the same praise can be partly bestowed. He and his regiment stood unflinchingly up to the work the entire portion of the day during which he acted under my orders. Colonel J. S. Alban and his lieutenant-colonel, Beall, of the Eighteenth Wisconsin, were,until they were wounded, ever to the front, encouraging their command. Colonel Jacob Fry, of the Sixty-first Illinois, with an undrilled regiment fresh in the service,kept his men well forward under every assault until the third line was formed, when he became detached, and fought under General Hurlbut. Colonel Shaw, of the Fourteenth Iowa, behaved with great coolness, disposed his men sharply at every command, and maintained his front unbroken through several fierce attacks. Colonel Tindall, Lieutenant-Colonel Morton, and Major McCullough, of the Twenty-third Missouri, are entitled to high meed of praise for gallant conduct.

It is difficult to discriminate among so many gallant men as surrounded me when we were forced to yield to the overpowering strength of the enemy. Their bravery under the hottest fire is testified to by the devotion with which they stood forward against fearful odds to contend for the cause they were engaged in. To the officers and men who thus held to the last their undaunted front too much praise cannot be given.

Captain McMichael, assistant adjutant-general,attached to the division commanded by General Wallace, joined me upon the field when his gallant leader fell. He is entitled to special mention for his conduct while so serving. Colonel David Moore is entitled to special mention.

Captain A. Hickenlooper, of the Fifth Ohio Battery, by his gallant conduct, commended himself to general praise.

My staff consisted of but three officers. Brigade Surg. S. W. Everett was killed early in the engagement, gallantly cheering the Eighteenth Missouri Regiment to the contest. Lieutenant Edwin Moore, aide-de-camp, during the entire battle, was by my side, unless when detached upon the dangerous service of his office. Captain Henry Binmore, assistant adjutant-general, was with me, performing his duty to my great satisfaction, until, being exhausted, I compelled him to leave the field.

I have the honor to be, colonel, very respectfully, your obedient servant,

B. M. PRENTISS,

Brigadier-General, U. S. Volunteers,

Colonel J. C. KELTON,

Asst. Adjt. Gen., U. S. Army, Washington, D. C.

[from The War of the Rebellion: Original Records of the Civil War, Serial 1, Volume 10 (Shiloh) – no longer in copyright.]

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Trying to anticipate, are we? :)

There's a lot more involved than this report. It does come into play, but it's only part of the story. 

Perry

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Perry

I've actually been engaged in another project IRT the beknighted Benjamin Prentiss (which is the thread that ties "Lauman at Metal Landing" and "Ross at Pinhook" and the changes of command at Fort Henry and Cairo, all together) ...and it occurred to me: why does not WHL Wallace (a prolific letter writer, sending correspondence to his wife, Ann, every two or three days) make mention of the arrival at Pittsburg Landing of Brigadier General Benjamin Prentiss? In The Life and Letters of WHL Wallace, then-Lieutenant Wallace writes home 23 SEP 1846 that, "the best officer in the two Illinois regiments -- Captain B. M. Prentiss -- is now in command of our company" [page 20]. In a letter written 12 MAY 1861, Wallace reports:  "I went to Cairo yesterday and saw General Prentiss." Two weeks later, he informs Ann, "I can now state the manner of my business: I assisted General Prentiss in enlisting '3-month's men' [of Illinois Infantry regiments 7 - 12] for the war" [page 116]. Other letters, written 5 August and 8 September, also mention happenings in regard to General Prentiss.

But, in none of the letters written from Pittsburg Landing -- the last dated 5 April 1862 -- does newly-promoted Brigadier General Wallace, in (temporary) command of "Smith's Second Division" since the morning of April 4th (see Letter of 3 APR) make mention of his old friend, Benjamin Prentiss, also being present at Pittsburg Landing...

And, in the Shiloh Report of General Prentiss, the commander of the Sixth Division expresses surprise at meeting WHL Wallace in command of the Second Division on Sunday, April 6th as he had requested reinforcements from Major General C.F. Smith (so he did not know Jacob Lauman had been temporary commander of the Second Division, either.) 

Which begs the question: when did B. M. Prentiss really arrive at Pittsburg Landing? What information and instructions were delivered by Major General Grant? [The report in OR 11 page 67 -- Special Orders No.36 of 26 March 1862, merely states; "Brig. Gen. B. M. Prentiss having reported for duty in this military district..." which could have been accomplished by Prentiss fronting up at Fort Henry, Fort Donelson... possibly, even Cairo, if word reached Savannah that Prentiss was at one of those places.

Was U.S. Grant capable of that sort of deception? Merely recall the persistent claim that it was "Smith's Division," and "General C. F. Smith, in command at Pittsburg Landing" (in order to deny command at Pittsburg Landing to senior officer, John McClernand) to determine that answer.

My point: WHL Wallace performed remarkably well on April 6th, by his own admission having assumed temporary command of Smith's Division only on the morning of April 4th. And I do not believe Benjamin Prentiss took personal command of his embryonic Sixth Division until a few days earlier than Wallace.

Just a few random thoughts

Ozzy

 

References:  http://archive.org/stream/lifelettersofgen01wall#page/184/mode/1up/search/Prentiss  Life and Letters of WHL Wallace

http://ebooks.library.cornell.edu/cgi/t/text/pageviewer-idx?c=moawar;cc=moawar;q1=Prentiss;rgn=full text;idno=waro0011;didno=waro0011;node=waro0011%3A2;view=image;seq=0069  Special Orders No. 36 of 26 March 1862.

SDG (various posts)

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×